<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Our Social Times &#187; who uses twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/tag/who-uses-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oursocialtimes.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Consultancy &#38; Events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:56:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who Really Uses Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/01/who-really-uses-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/01/who-really-uses-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Brynley-Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inbound marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people on twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter for business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter for marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter for pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who uses twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oursocialtimes.com/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Twitter is reputedly growing at 700% per annum and hitting the headlines, it's sometimes easy to get carried away with it's significance. Obviously, if you're a daily Twitterer who's plugged in to several active networks and using TweetDeck (or a similar tool) as your primary source of news - it seems like anyone who is anyone is using Twitter. But really, are they?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://oursocialtimes.com/?s=Twitter"><img class="alignleft" title="Twitter bird" src="http://files.jhuskisson.com/blog/twitter_bird.jpg" alt="" width="390" height="258" /></a>While Twitter is reputedly growing at 700% per annum and hitting the headlines, it&#8217;s sometimes easy to get carried away with it&#8217;s significance. Obviously, if you&#8217;re a daily Twitterer who&#8217;s plugged in to several active networks and using TweetDeck (or a similar tool) as your primary source of news &#8211; it seems like anyone who is anyone is using Twitter. But really, are they?</p>
<p>The fact is, the Twitter user-base is still a tenth of the size of Facebook and the majority of users remain casual (if not dormant) Twitterers who&#8217;ve posted more Tweets than they have followers. Granted, if you&#8217;re in the media, marketing or PR, you&#8217;ll find millions of active users to follow and engage with, but what about those of us who work in more publicity shy, less showy industries and business sectors?</p>
<p>If, for example, you&#8217;re an Insurance Lawyer you&#8217;ll have a <a title="insurance lawyers on Twitter" href="http://tweepsearch.com/search?query=%22Insurance%22+AND+%22Lawyer%22&amp;commit=Do+Your+Thing!">choice of 25</a> people to follow. That&#8217;s pretty lame as far as global communities go, but it&#8217;s a veritable thronging crowd compared to the connections available Bond Brokers. If you want to discuss the complex business of buying and selling bonds, you can choose to talk to <a title="bond dealer" href="http://twitter.com/oX_CEO">David from Chicago</a> or <a title="bond dealer" href="http://twitter.com/Bonddad">Jeffrey from Georgia</a>. Good luck with that one.</p>
<p>Creative industries seem to be disproportionately well represented on Twitter. A quick search for &#8220;sculptors&#8221; produces <a title="sculptors on twitter" href="http://tweepsearch.com/search?query=sculptor&amp;commit=Search">676 results</a> and over 9,000 people have the word &#8220;printer&#8221; (or print) in their profiles. Evidently this (relatively) new medium offers fresh ground for innovators and explorers of ideas. As Copyblogger <a title="creative people" href="http://www.copyblogger.com/highly-creative-people/">points out</a>, highly creative people generally &#8220;have the courage to try new things and risk failure. Every big breakthrough starts as a harebrained idea.&#8221; And, rightly or wrongly, Twitter still falls into the &#8220;hair-brained idea&#8221; category for majority of business people.</p>
<p>Clearly, some perspective is needed here. One the one hand, many (probably most) industries are yet to populate the Twittersphere, but if the current growth of the service is maintained, that&#8217;s likely to happen in the next couple of years. On the other hand, there&#8217;s already huge value in finding and engaging with the press and media types in your industry, who you&#8217;re likely to find on Twitter today (in fact there are several <a title="journalists on twitter" href="http://stedavies.com/2008/11/uk-journalists-on-twitter/">lists</a> to help you).  How else can you share snippets of news with influential journalists throughout the day without triggering a string of restraining orders?</p>
<p>In spite of my reservations, I still advise all of my clients to start using Twitter, simply so they understand social media at its most viral and get a feel for how communications are likely to develop. Anyone who thinks Twitter is not a business tool is hugely mistaken and likely to pay a heavy price within the next 2-3 years. Expect &#8220;meme&#8221; news and communication services to proliferate in the shadow of this little bird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oursocialtimes.com/index.php/2010/01/who-really-uses-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

